What a review trail is
A structured note history for viewing proof, comparing players, marking missing evidence, and deciding whether to return later.
Review Notes
Track your player reviews, watchlist notes, and what evidence you found. Keep clear cricket assessment that builds trust over time. Review does not guarantee selection, contracts, or sponsorship.
A structured note history for viewing proof, comparing players, marking missing evidence, and deciding whether to return later.
Good notes explain the review reason so scouts, clubs, and academies do not rely on memory, hype, or one short clip.
Private reviewer notes, shortlist reasons, request history, and internal concerns should not become public player reputation.
A shortlist reason should explain role fit, proof quality, missing evidence, availability context, and why the player is worth a future review.
Use safe labels such as Needs context, Clear enough for first review, Strong role evidence, Needs more proof, and Not enough information.
Future saved history may show what evidence was requested, why it was requested, and whether the player added clearer context.
Clubs and academies can use the same structure to explain role needs, development fit, and trial-preparation questions without guaranteeing outcomes.
Future SQL planning may include viewed profile, compared player, evidence quality label, shortlist reason, request-more-proof reason, reviewer note, visibility setting, and resolved status. This phase does not save any review trail.